🔗 Share this article

Legal representatives told the court that law enforcement had reasonable suspicions indicating Tommy Robinson's mobile held material relevant to acts of terrorism when they detained him in the previous year as he attempted to depart from the UK.

Refusal to Provide Device Password

The far-right activist, whose real name is Tommy Robinson, reportedly declined to hand over his password to police, stating it contained journalist content.” This occurred after he was stopped at the Eurotunnel on July 28, 2024.

Prosecution Arguments on Anti-Terror Authority

On the last day of the trial, prosecutor Jo Morris argued that the anti-terror authorities used by law enforcement are designed to allow information collection. She claimed that officers had valid grounds to believe the defendant continued to have links to far-right activists, even following the dissolution of the English Defence League (EDL).

“Although his membership of the English Defence League has come to an end, his views have not disappeared. He is recognized for holding those views and therefore it is a reasonable suspicion to think that on his phone there could be data pertaining to acts of terrorism,” she told the court.

The prosecutor continued, His opinions – to which he is allowed – were not the subject for their attention on July 28. It was his association to others who are potentially involved in illegal actions.”

Details of the Detention

The activist had arrived by himself at the Channel tunnel in a luxury vehicle belonging to a friend and was on his way to the Spanish resort of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a small bag, the court heard.

The funds was said to have been from a donation drive to cover expenses from arranging a large demonstration that took place the previous day in a London landmark.

Legal Team Submissions

Robinson, who disputes failing to comply with anti-terror laws during the incident on 28 July last year, could receive up to three months in jail or a potential £2,500 fine if convicted.

His barrister, Alisdair Williamson KC, argued in final arguments that anti-terror officers who stopped Robinson had conducted a “fishing expedition” and that he had been illegally held.

Citing evidence from officers who stated they called “partner agencies” after detaining Robinson, the defense lawyer said this was a allusion to the security services and that lack of proof had been presented from MI5 to suggest his defendant was a security threat.

Williamson asserted the police intervention was biased” because it was based to a large extent on a protected characteristic.” He said that the “predominant influence” on the choice to stop him was recognizing his identity”.

He noted that officers had used an special authority that must be carefully regulated” to try to discover details that was previously available. The barrister proposed that Robinson journeyed to Benidorm frequently, which should have reduced the police concerns about him.

Expenses and Verdict Date

Robinson claimed that his legal costs in the proceedings were being covered by the tech billionaire, the owner of X and Tesla, who has appeared as an supporter of the far-right activist and recently addressed a rally arranged by him in London via a online broadcast.

A proposed date of next Tuesday for the decision was changed by the district judge, the judge, after the defense said Robinson was scheduled to be a guest of the Israeli government from Wednesday and would not come back until October 25.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated Williamson.

The judge said he would deliver his ruling on the morning of 4 November.